[QUOTE=peteronmaui;3978]Isn't the following message 'sudden death' for All Evolutions?
Dear Customers:
Interbank FX,...
QUOTE 
]
Not only evos but especially robominer and Gt-shadow. Our top three performers are being affected. The NFA is not looking out for the investor they are looking out for the brokers that our part of their association. Read this little bit about the NFA it makes sense:
http://nondealingdesk.com/showthread.php?t=2529
We shouldn't need "big brother"(NFA) telling us how to trade, we are all big kids and know the risk when we enter into the forex jungle, just like gambling. The only reason big brother would need to say something is if we were beating the
broker 
(the ones who write their pay checks). The
point 
is hedging works when used the right way, if they are so worried why don't they protect us from the martingale systems, or using fibonacci?!? HMMM.. bc/ hedging works and the brokers don't like it.
Here is a
quote 
from the compliance rule
“the customer pays carrying charges that +++ALWAYS EXCEED THE FUNDS IT RECEIVES++++. In a normal transaction, a customer receives “interest” on the
long position 
and pays “interest” on the
short position 
. Since the two transactions are mirror images,
you would expect the receipts and payments to zero out. In practice, however, the
amount a customer receives on a
long position 
is always less than the amount a
customer pays on a
short position 
. Since these transfers occur daily when the positions
roll over, the loss increases continually over time…”
Yes, you do get charged more on the carry then you get paid but thats common sense, you are not always charged for
swap 
unless you hold it for the next day. If I am willing to pay what like about a pip worth of
swap 
to protect my profit then so be it thats part of the strategy!!