MatrixNN

[1ka]

Regarding EAResults.com, I think the statement for MatrixNN is here.

The site itself is not too bad, but it doesn't actually run the EA's just verifies the results. I guess it must check the trades against the actual charts to see if there was a valid trade on that day. How it can verify against forgeries, I don't know.

(And to ensure that there is no further confusion, I am not implying that MatrixNN has forged any results.)

[PipCop]

Interesting to see, but unless I am missing something I only show a few days of tests?

From 9-7-2008 to 9-17-2008?

I would also like to know more details about how the authenticate the results. While I am used to seeing the MT statements, and I know they can be manipulated because they are just HTML, at least you can validate the timestamps are being updated regularly. With that system, it appears it's just data from a database. How is it gathered?

[1ka]

It might be the wrong chart, I could see anything else in the list that might be applicable.

As you know, when you publish results it uses the date range you've specified in the Account History. I suspect they've got a strange date selection there.

I don't know it EA results uses a database to store the results, or whether it uses the published HTML?

Too many questions, not enough answers

[RCAcad7403]

Ive been following MatriX NN for some time, as it has been heavily hyped and advertised everywhere. Some people on other forex blogs are swearing this thing is getting 20+% results / month. Meanwhile, all the back testing looks decent. Each versions shows close to an initial or eventuall 17% draw down! ouch. I bet this thing will crash and burn right off the bet, under a live test. Neural Network? Come on, give me a break.

BOOO this one MAN!!

what did the 5 fingers say to the face?.....



SLAP!

[Batchboy]

Originally Posted by RCAcad7403

Ive been following MatriX NN for some time, as it has been heavily hyped and advertised everywhere. Some people on other forex blogs are swearing this thing is getting 20+% results / month. Meanwhile, all the back testing looks decent. Each versions shows close to an initial or eventuall 17% draw down! ouch. I bet this thing will crash and burn right off the bet, under a live test. Neural Network? Come on, give me a break.

BOOO this one MAN!!

what did the 5 fingers say to the face?.....



SLAP!

Glad someone has been following it! How long you been checking it out? Any posted performance url (other than their back-tests on website) you can give us? 17% DD when monthly it does 20% range ........... think about it, it's ok, so do we chance passing-it-up? And it has no grid/martingale per them. And I think we can't judge on idea that it "probably really doesn't have NN's in it" because NN work could result in a math model which is EA programmable!
So I vote for donation button, you vote against I guess? Any other votes?
jb

[RCAcad7403]

Im down for the cops busting anyone who claims they have somthin special there using or somthing commercially that boasts as bad as somthing like MatrixNN. On other sites ive checked out, people claim all the great from this thing but, NO one has ever posted a statment!! Its BS as far as im concerned. I want them to cell block this one asap. Ive never used it but as always, I will eagerly look onward as this one may be tested. Hopefully they will find one that actually does a reasonable job. Could it be MatriX NN, could it......could it? We will just have to wait and see......